Seguir
Ciaran Martin
Primer consejero delegado del National Cyber Security Centre británico, hoy profesor de práctica en la Blavatnik School of Government de Oxford, que califica el escenario de un enjambre de agentes de IA apoderándose de todo internet en un año de «experimento mental disfrazado de advertencia basada en pruebas».
Cargos
- dic 2013 – actualidadHead of cyber security, Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ)Recommended the establishment of a UK National Cyber Security Centre within the intelligence and security agency; the Government agreed and the Chancellor announced it in November 2015.Fuente →
- feb 2016 – ago 2020Founding Chief Executive, National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC)The centre became operational in October 2016. He had planned to resign in June 2020 and delayed until August because of the COVID-19 pandemic; succeeded by Lindy Cameron.Fuente →
- sept 2020 – actualidadProfessor of Practice in the Management of Public Organisations, Blavatnik School of Government, University of OxfordFuente →
En el registro
13 sept 2026 · Publicación · LinkedIn
a thought experiment masquerading as an evidence-based warning
Professor of Practice in the Management of Public Organisations, Blavatnik School of Government, University of Oxford en aquel momento
Said of one specific scenario put during the September 2026 debate — an agent swarm of the kind that breached Hugging Face taking over the whole internet with a persistent botnet within six to twelve months — and not of the wider concern about the pace of AI development. The outlet reports him arguing that the scenario assumes the absence or failure of three decades of security controls: network segmentation, monitoring, endpoint protection, DDoS mitigation, incident response and coordinated botnet disruption. The words are a quoted fragment inside the reporter's sentence ("Martin's assessment was blunt: The scenario was 'a thought experiment masquerading as an evidence-based warning.'"), so they are rendered without a capital. The remark was made in a LinkedIn analysis which this register has not read directly; the source is the outlet that reproduces the phrase, and the date is the date printed on that page, not the date of the post.